Biografija ir politinė kova
| Year | Issue | Start Page | End Page |
|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 54 | 28 | 39 |
| URI | Access Rights |
|---|---|
| https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14911/119779 | |
| Straipsnis | Viso teksto dokumentas (atviroji prieiga) / Full Text Document (Open Access) |
Straipsnyje nagrinėjamas individo biografijos ir tautos istorijos santykis. Iškeliamos tezės: individo biografija, įrašoma į politinę aplinką, tampa jos plėtros veiksniu; politinė visuma yra individo gyvenimo egzistencinė, kalbos ir rašto aplinka; individas kuria biografiją įrašydamas savo egzistencinę istoriją į šią abipusių sąveikų aplinką. Pasak autoriaus, biografija yra politinio darinio (brolijos), kur puoselėjamas individualus egzistencinis projektas, kovos dël atvirumo veiksnys. Tezės iliustruojamos pavyzdžiais iš Lietuvos-Lenkijos istorijos. Nagrinėjama demokratijos sąranga bei jos formos. Pasak autoriaus, nėra demokratijos etalono, tėra įvairios jos formos kaip valdymo principų simbiozės. Teigiama, kad demokratija kaip simbiozė gera ne tiek savo sluoksnių, balsų ir įrašų gausa, kiek geba sudaryti rišlų politinį kūną, tarnaujantį savo individų egzistenciniam tapsmui.
The article deals with the relation between an individual biography and the nation's history. The author states that the environment both of the individual and the nation is linguistic-written. The next theses are raised: being inscribed into the political environment, the individual's biography becomes a factor of its development; the political whole is an existential, linguistic and written environment of individual life; an individual creates his biography inscribing his existential history into this environment of mutual interconnections; the political environment is a dynamic open whole thanks to individual's fight for his biographical whole. According to the author, the biography is a factor of the political body (brotherhood). The inscribing supposes a linguistic-written environment of mutual becoming. The theses are illustrated with help of examples from Lithuanian-Polish history. A special attention is paid to the sources of the Lublin union and to its architects who were influenced by biographical motives. The author presents a hypothesis that the political body of both nations was ruined not by the political brotherhood's (noblemen's) anxiousness about its democratic rights but by inadequate symbioses of democracy and aristocracy that did not prevent a hegemony of neighboring political bodies. As well, the author analyses the structure of democracy and its forms. According to the author, there is no etalon of democracy; there are only different forms of democracy. According to the author, as a symbiosis democracy is good, not having many shifts, voices and scriptures, but still able to form a harmonic political body that provides for the existential becoming of its individuals.