| Creator | Affiliation |
|---|---|
| Contributor(s) | |
|---|---|
Grif, Iaroslav | FOP „Grif Iaroslav“, Ukraina |
Rinkinį sudaro penki PDF failai su penkių miestų brėžiniais. Juose išskirtos pramoninės zonos ir socializmo laikotarpiu, nuo XX a. šeštojo iki devintojo dešimtmečio imtinai, pastatyti pastatai. Brėžiniai parengti 2025 m. rugpjūčio–spalio mėn. Miestai (pavadinimai originalo kalba): Eisenhüttenstadt, Karviná, Kohtla-Järve, Schwedt ir Visaginas.
The dataset comprises five PDF files with drawings of Eisenhüttenstadt, Karviná, Kohtla-Järve, Schwedt and Visaginas. The drawings highlight each town’s industrial zone and the buildings constructed during the socialist period, from the 1950s through the 1980s. They were prepared between August and October 2025.
Research Council of Lithuania | S-PD-24-119 |
Item type:Publication, research article[2026][S1a][H003][39]Land, 2026, vol. vol. 15, no. iss. 8, p. 1-39Post-socialist monotowns and mono-functional urban districts face interrelated economic, spatial, institutional, and identity crises, yet their transformation trajectories vary. Building on the previously developed methodological framework, the study implements its second stage by selecting reference cases and reconstructing transformation trajectories in Central and Eastern Europe. Seven weighted criteria—identity reframing, multi-level governance and actors, cultural vitality, economic diversification, heritage and architectural significance, positive physical transformation, and regional connectivity—were applied to nine purposively selected cases in Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Scores ranged from 1.40 to 4.05; five cases were retained, comprising a stable four-case core and a weight-sensitive fifth case selected for typological and target-context complementarity. Cross-case analysis identified four overlapping contours: crisis-adaptive, institutional-spatial, heritage-symbolic, and cultural-everyday. Transformation was asynchronous and non-linear: symbolic, institutional, cultural, spatial, and economic changes unfolded in different sequences, while economic diversification remained limited or moderate in most cases. Given theory-informed, author-assigned weights and a regionally bounded, typologically heterogeneous sample, the ranking is a case-selection tool rather than a measure of transformation success. The reconstructed trajectories provide the analytical basis for the subsequent assessment of their transferability to Piatykhatky (Kharkiv, Ukraine).
1